snathan
09-16 07:57 AM
snathan,
First of all dummgelauft is referring to something that is applicable to US law (US citizen uncle marrying niece - incest - illegal), some custom in South India has no jurisdiction in the US.
This "custom" is a clear formula for genetic degradation !! Wonder who thought about this and made it a "custom". Some such traditions really need to change... it will take time but will happen.
The incest comes into picture only if minors involved. You need to understand the custom how it works. In 1970s people used to have 6-7 kids. The age difference between the first and the younger/last one around 10 years and its not uncommon. Make it short, normaly the age difference is 5-8 between the uncle and the niece. Both are adults and they decide if the want to get married. When both are adults and allowed in law, how its going to affact immigration. Tell me whats the definition of incest. Is it only based on the age, involves minor or has more jurisdiction and definition. If the relationship decides and defines incest, I am wondering whats your take on Gay marriage. Isnt it degrading ?
Marriage between 1st cousins illegal, says HC - The Times of India (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Marriage-between-1st-cousins-illegal-says-HC/articleshow/6550296.cms)
I am not supporting/aginst this custom. This is not the place to debate about this. Only thing is how it affacts the immigration
First of all dummgelauft is referring to something that is applicable to US law (US citizen uncle marrying niece - incest - illegal), some custom in South India has no jurisdiction in the US.
This "custom" is a clear formula for genetic degradation !! Wonder who thought about this and made it a "custom". Some such traditions really need to change... it will take time but will happen.
The incest comes into picture only if minors involved. You need to understand the custom how it works. In 1970s people used to have 6-7 kids. The age difference between the first and the younger/last one around 10 years and its not uncommon. Make it short, normaly the age difference is 5-8 between the uncle and the niece. Both are adults and they decide if the want to get married. When both are adults and allowed in law, how its going to affact immigration. Tell me whats the definition of incest. Is it only based on the age, involves minor or has more jurisdiction and definition. If the relationship decides and defines incest, I am wondering whats your take on Gay marriage. Isnt it degrading ?
Marriage between 1st cousins illegal, says HC - The Times of India (http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Marriage-between-1st-cousins-illegal-says-HC/articleshow/6550296.cms)
I am not supporting/aginst this custom. This is not the place to debate about this. Only thing is how it affacts the immigration
wallpaper 2011 Modified VW Golf MK4 R32
eb3_nepa
03-22 11:31 AM
Admin
One question abt my personal case. I am eb3 with a Master of Science in Info Systems. I have abt 4.5 years experience in a related field. Labor applied in Jun 2003, I-140 applied in Jun 2004. Havnet been able to apply for I-485 yet. Will the STEM benefit me. The reason i ask is, i see so many posts about I-140 and labor etc. I thought all you needed was an MS and 3+ years in a related field.
One question abt my personal case. I am eb3 with a Master of Science in Info Systems. I have abt 4.5 years experience in a related field. Labor applied in Jun 2003, I-140 applied in Jun 2004. Havnet been able to apply for I-485 yet. Will the STEM benefit me. The reason i ask is, i see so many posts about I-140 and labor etc. I thought all you needed was an MS and 3+ years in a related field.
go_guy123
02-26 02:39 PM
yeah I realized it doesn't make any sense (wishful thinking). I guess the only option I will have then is to go for CPT as Phani suggested...! I was wondering if there were any other options out there...
I don't think you can use CPT after graduation. Only OPT can be used after graduation unless you haven't already used it completely.
However using CPT as Phani suggested cant be used for full time when school is on. only for 20 hrs per week.
Also so long you need to remain in school to need to take full credits (except last semester)
I don't think you can use CPT after graduation. Only OPT can be used after graduation unless you haven't already used it completely.
However using CPT as Phani suggested cant be used for full time when school is on. only for 20 hrs per week.
Also so long you need to remain in school to need to take full credits (except last semester)
2011 wallpaper VW Golf MK4 Style A
getgc2008
03-24 12:08 PM
you should have copies of documents for what you filed your labor. What is your PD? Check the flsdata Perm Cases and get the sic code if you know. It will mostly be .NET developer...
more...
gsc999
03-27 12:46 PM
Someone posted a new article from BusinessWeek dated 27th March in the New threads
Originally Posted by sunofeast_gc
http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/...ex _top+story
********************
Quote: "Durbin's plan may also make it much harder for companies to hire foreign workers under the H-1B program at lower wages than current workers. One of the most common criticisms of the visa program is that companies use it to hire foreign workers at lower wages than they would pay Americans."
Hellooo... this is already a part of the H1-B program, how ignorant of the law do you have to be to be saying this? Durbin needs to understand the H1-B program as it stand now before proposing redundant and time wasting bills and amendments. It seems he is getting support of the anti-immigration lobby who foster such nonsence about the H1-B wages being lower than normal wages.
Originally Posted by sunofeast_gc
http://www.businessweek.com/bwdaily/...ex _top+story
********************
Quote: "Durbin's plan may also make it much harder for companies to hire foreign workers under the H-1B program at lower wages than current workers. One of the most common criticisms of the visa program is that companies use it to hire foreign workers at lower wages than they would pay Americans."
Hellooo... this is already a part of the H1-B program, how ignorant of the law do you have to be to be saying this? Durbin needs to understand the H1-B program as it stand now before proposing redundant and time wasting bills and amendments. It seems he is getting support of the anti-immigration lobby who foster such nonsence about the H1-B wages being lower than normal wages.
amitga
01-25 07:11 PM
In washington DC they take one day
more...
gcpool
07-19 02:11 PM
Am going to as a basic question.
How can an MBA improve your career?
My (and all my friends') I-485 are EB2. So if we must be employed before I-485 approval, then how about between I-485 approval and getting the physical green card? Can we go back to school full time? I heard that sometimes it takes more than 6 months to get the card after I-485 approval.
I searched the forum, many people seem to be interested in going back to school during I-485 pending. (who does not want a better career and money??). But there is no definite answer so far.
How can an MBA improve your career?
My (and all my friends') I-485 are EB2. So if we must be employed before I-485 approval, then how about between I-485 approval and getting the physical green card? Can we go back to school full time? I heard that sometimes it takes more than 6 months to get the card after I-485 approval.
I searched the forum, many people seem to be interested in going back to school during I-485 pending. (who does not want a better career and money??). But there is no definite answer so far.
2010 VW Golf Mk4 GTi,
bkarnik
05-22 09:39 PM
I am not sure if INS can decide to recpature visas and exempt spouses from the limit - these two seems should be covered by a law enacted at higher level. But issuing EAD early (or increasing the validity of EAD from one year to three years); and/or the ability of applying for 485 before the visa numbers available these two seems possible. Remember even ombudsman recommended to increase EAD's validity to increase the efficiency. I remember IV had plans to pursue this type of effort in parallel; but now that we have a once in a long time chance to enact a law to incorporate most of our issues I think IV core team is concentrated on that effort. But I would suggest having a secondary team (from new volunteers) to pursue these types of parallel activities. At least we can evaluate if its feasible or not.
Before someone asks me to stop giving advice/suggestion and contribute or shut my mouth etc; I am sending another contribution towards 130K goal and am also willing to volunteer and give my time if its useful.
NK2006:
A similar discussion was started by me in April. See thread http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=556 subsequent to that I raised the issue with my immigration lawyer. Following is the email chain for your reading pleasure (names have been deleted for confidentiality). I would suggest that each of us raise this issue with their respective lawyers. Hopefully, if they get sufficient queries, the AILA may be moved to do something about the matter.
All the best.
Bkarnik.
Email Chain follows:
From: My immigration lawyer
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 6:49 AM
To: BKarnik
Subject: RE: Question..
I see your point. You should contact the American Immigration Lawyers Association with your question. If the issue has not already been addressed by this organization, I'm sure they will readily champion your cause.
-----Original Message-----
From: BKarnik
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 6:49 AM
To: My immigration lawyer
Subject: RE: Question..
(XXXX):
Thank you for your time and the quick turnaround. However, the question still remains. If you notice in the link sent by you below, the USCIS refers to the US 8 CFR 274a.12(a) and (c) According to the USCIS, the CFR is the interpretation made by the agencies of the INA as passed and amended by Congress. The INA itself does not seem to have any clause relating to EAD for employment based categories because I believe the Congress never foresaw a situation where it will take up to 5-6 years for the process to complete.
I know that the USCIS has on many occasions by using the Federal Register or by Memorandums modified the CFR or changed the regulations governing the validity of the EAD, and I am wondering if something similar can be achieved in this case, wherein an appeal is made to the USCIS to change the rules governing eligibility for issuing an EAD.
Thanks once again.
(MY name deleted)
-----Original Message-----
From: My immigration lawyer
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 4:57 PM
To: BKARNIK
Subject: RE: Question..
Hello (XXXX):
Your argument is sound, however, U.S. Immigration does indeed adjudicate
I-765 EAD applications based upon eligibility for filing. Please click this
link: http://uscis.gov/graphics/formsfee/forms/i-765.htm. It will take you to the USCIS web site where you can download form I-765. Included with the form is an instruction sheet. In the section entitled "Eligibility Categories", U.S. Immigration spells out the categories for which form I-765 may be filed. For example, under the "Foreign Students" title, you can see that an F-1 OPT student is eligible to obtain EAD work authorization pursuant to subsection (c)(3)(i). Your eligibility for EAD work authorization will fall under the "EAD Applicants Who Have Filed for Adjustment of Status" title under subsection (c)(9). Unfortunately, there is no eligibility category for I-140 IVP applicants or for IVP approval notice holders.
I hope this answers your questions.
(Lawyer name deleted)
________________________________
From: BKARNIK
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 2:16 PM
To: my Immigration lawyer
Subject: Question..
XXXX (lawyer's name edited):
I had a question for you (actually, it is a series of sub questions).
However, this has nothing to with (name of employer deleted), so if you feel that replying to this question will take up an inordinate amount of time or of you think that this is something that is worthwhile in pursuing, please let me know what your charges will be and I will let you know if I can afford them :)) With that out of the way, here goes:
The question is about getting an EAD before filing the I-485. I was perusing the INA as posted on the USCIS website. I did not find any applicable law that directs the USCIS when it can issue EADs. It is quite likely that I missed the section as I am not a student of laws as you are.
If so, can you let me know where to find it? As you know, the EAD issue is mentioned in the US 8 CFR sec. 274a. Now, the USCIS website explains that the CFR thus: The general provisions of laws enacted by Congress are interpreted and implemented by regulations issued by various agencies.
These regulations apply the law to daily situations. Thus, the CFR is the interpretation of the law by the USCIS for application in daily life.
If that is the case, what prevents the USCIS from issuing EADs upon the approval of Form I-140? Especially, since as you very well know, the Form I-140 is an application made by the employer to the USCIS to petition for an alien worker to become a permanent resident in the United States.
Therefore, the form requires the employer to fill in all the pertinent information about the alien and his dependents. An approval of the Form I-140 indicates (at least to me) that the USCIS has agreed with the employee that the labor certification is good and the alien is approvable as a permanent employee. I guess that is one of the reasons, the USCIS allows concurrent filing of the I-140/I-485.
With the current retrogression concurrent filing of I-140/I-485 is not possible, if the USCIS were to be agreeable to issue EADs to persons with approved I-140 it would make life a lot easier for all while at the same time not impacting the green card process itself. All we are asking is that the EAD be issued after I-140 approval, because it does not make sense to tell an employer that the alien is approved for permanent employment, but at the same time asking the employer to keep the employee in a H1B (i.e. temporary status) at no fault of the employer/employee. Can you let me know if my argument is flawed? If not, do you think we have a way by which we can ask the USCIS for its interpretation or opinion on the issue? If we can, and you are willing to take the matter, can you let me know your fees?
I know that you are very busy, and may not be able to take on the matter even if you find merit in it. In that case, would know of a competent person willing to take it up?
Thank you for your time and patience,
Sincerely,
(my name deleted)
Before someone asks me to stop giving advice/suggestion and contribute or shut my mouth etc; I am sending another contribution towards 130K goal and am also willing to volunteer and give my time if its useful.
NK2006:
A similar discussion was started by me in April. See thread http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=556 subsequent to that I raised the issue with my immigration lawyer. Following is the email chain for your reading pleasure (names have been deleted for confidentiality). I would suggest that each of us raise this issue with their respective lawyers. Hopefully, if they get sufficient queries, the AILA may be moved to do something about the matter.
All the best.
Bkarnik.
Email Chain follows:
From: My immigration lawyer
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 6:49 AM
To: BKarnik
Subject: RE: Question..
I see your point. You should contact the American Immigration Lawyers Association with your question. If the issue has not already been addressed by this organization, I'm sure they will readily champion your cause.
-----Original Message-----
From: BKarnik
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 6:49 AM
To: My immigration lawyer
Subject: RE: Question..
(XXXX):
Thank you for your time and the quick turnaround. However, the question still remains. If you notice in the link sent by you below, the USCIS refers to the US 8 CFR 274a.12(a) and (c) According to the USCIS, the CFR is the interpretation made by the agencies of the INA as passed and amended by Congress. The INA itself does not seem to have any clause relating to EAD for employment based categories because I believe the Congress never foresaw a situation where it will take up to 5-6 years for the process to complete.
I know that the USCIS has on many occasions by using the Federal Register or by Memorandums modified the CFR or changed the regulations governing the validity of the EAD, and I am wondering if something similar can be achieved in this case, wherein an appeal is made to the USCIS to change the rules governing eligibility for issuing an EAD.
Thanks once again.
(MY name deleted)
-----Original Message-----
From: My immigration lawyer
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 4:57 PM
To: BKARNIK
Subject: RE: Question..
Hello (XXXX):
Your argument is sound, however, U.S. Immigration does indeed adjudicate
I-765 EAD applications based upon eligibility for filing. Please click this
link: http://uscis.gov/graphics/formsfee/forms/i-765.htm. It will take you to the USCIS web site where you can download form I-765. Included with the form is an instruction sheet. In the section entitled "Eligibility Categories", U.S. Immigration spells out the categories for which form I-765 may be filed. For example, under the "Foreign Students" title, you can see that an F-1 OPT student is eligible to obtain EAD work authorization pursuant to subsection (c)(3)(i). Your eligibility for EAD work authorization will fall under the "EAD Applicants Who Have Filed for Adjustment of Status" title under subsection (c)(9). Unfortunately, there is no eligibility category for I-140 IVP applicants or for IVP approval notice holders.
I hope this answers your questions.
(Lawyer name deleted)
________________________________
From: BKARNIK
Sent: Monday, April 17, 2006 2:16 PM
To: my Immigration lawyer
Subject: Question..
XXXX (lawyer's name edited):
I had a question for you (actually, it is a series of sub questions).
However, this has nothing to with (name of employer deleted), so if you feel that replying to this question will take up an inordinate amount of time or of you think that this is something that is worthwhile in pursuing, please let me know what your charges will be and I will let you know if I can afford them :)) With that out of the way, here goes:
The question is about getting an EAD before filing the I-485. I was perusing the INA as posted on the USCIS website. I did not find any applicable law that directs the USCIS when it can issue EADs. It is quite likely that I missed the section as I am not a student of laws as you are.
If so, can you let me know where to find it? As you know, the EAD issue is mentioned in the US 8 CFR sec. 274a. Now, the USCIS website explains that the CFR thus: The general provisions of laws enacted by Congress are interpreted and implemented by regulations issued by various agencies.
These regulations apply the law to daily situations. Thus, the CFR is the interpretation of the law by the USCIS for application in daily life.
If that is the case, what prevents the USCIS from issuing EADs upon the approval of Form I-140? Especially, since as you very well know, the Form I-140 is an application made by the employer to the USCIS to petition for an alien worker to become a permanent resident in the United States.
Therefore, the form requires the employer to fill in all the pertinent information about the alien and his dependents. An approval of the Form I-140 indicates (at least to me) that the USCIS has agreed with the employee that the labor certification is good and the alien is approvable as a permanent employee. I guess that is one of the reasons, the USCIS allows concurrent filing of the I-140/I-485.
With the current retrogression concurrent filing of I-140/I-485 is not possible, if the USCIS were to be agreeable to issue EADs to persons with approved I-140 it would make life a lot easier for all while at the same time not impacting the green card process itself. All we are asking is that the EAD be issued after I-140 approval, because it does not make sense to tell an employer that the alien is approved for permanent employment, but at the same time asking the employer to keep the employee in a H1B (i.e. temporary status) at no fault of the employer/employee. Can you let me know if my argument is flawed? If not, do you think we have a way by which we can ask the USCIS for its interpretation or opinion on the issue? If we can, and you are willing to take the matter, can you let me know your fees?
I know that you are very busy, and may not be able to take on the matter even if you find merit in it. In that case, would know of a competent person willing to take it up?
Thank you for your time and patience,
Sincerely,
(my name deleted)
more...
puvathoor
01-14 06:48 PM
Team..
I would like to find out if there is any way to get copies of Certified Labor (when the employer policy is not to share this with employee even after 180 days of filing AOS and I-140 approval)
I have seen many posts about these but no definite answers..
I read a DOL memo that they respond only to USCIS about requests for copies of approved labor.
I need to find out my DOL Job code #.
Are there others in the same boat who have tried other routes to get a copy of certified labor?
I would like to find out if there is any way to get copies of Certified Labor (when the employer policy is not to share this with employee even after 180 days of filing AOS and I-140 approval)
I have seen many posts about these but no definite answers..
I read a DOL memo that they respond only to USCIS about requests for copies of approved labor.
I need to find out my DOL Job code #.
Are there others in the same boat who have tried other routes to get a copy of certified labor?
hair Cruise control. £11250. mk4
manderson
02-19 02:32 PM
On a similar line, I would like to ask that what's the best place to keep all the imp docs like H1B, passport, 140 485 etc. I am talking about original papers. I already have scanned backup of all my docs. Is there anyway, we can secure digital docs as well?
original hard copies - safety deposit box in your bank
digital scanned copies - yahoo my briefcase, gmail (zip everything and email it to yourself as an attachment), google docs, etc.
original hard copies - safety deposit box in your bank
digital scanned copies - yahoo my briefcase, gmail (zip everything and email it to yourself as an attachment), google docs, etc.
more...
kumar1
07-11 12:21 PM
**IMMIGRATION** -- One guy asked me, so do you get a Green Card when you land here at the port of entry? He was confused between I-94 and Green Card..............I felt like pull off my own hair.
hot Vw Golf Mk4 1.6 16V Modified
roseball
11-28 12:09 PM
US employment based immigation system, unlike that of other countries such as Canada and Australia, is based on market demand. If recession hits, there will be a lot of layoffs, especially in the financial sectors. A lot of outsourcing will happen to cut costs, which will increase the demand in work force in India and China. We can expect a lot of people to return home. This will free up visa numbers and the result will be - faster GC.
But, at that time, getting GC will not be any sweeter than returning home.
People...please contradict/support/offer alternate opinions.
How would USCIS know that someone has abandoned his GC and left the country for good....They would only know about it if an RFE is issued or an interview is scheduled (a very small percentage of cases) or if the employer notifies them (very rare)....Since there are already thousands of applications in the 485 queue, I dont see any significant impact on "visa numbers freeing up"......
But, at that time, getting GC will not be any sweeter than returning home.
People...please contradict/support/offer alternate opinions.
How would USCIS know that someone has abandoned his GC and left the country for good....They would only know about it if an RFE is issued or an interview is scheduled (a very small percentage of cases) or if the employer notifies them (very rare)....Since there are already thousands of applications in the 485 queue, I dont see any significant impact on "visa numbers freeing up"......
more...
house the Sunday quot;VW Golf club
dpp
08-09 09:17 AM
It is there buddy,
(c) TEMPORARY WORKERS.--Section 214(g) (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)) is amended--
+ 115,000 in the first fiscal year beginning after the date of the enactment of this clause; and
+ [Cap Exempt: Advanced degree in science, technology, engineering, or math.'';]
+ If the numerical limitation in paragraph (1)(A)--
+ ``(A) is reached during a given fiscal year, the numerical limitation under paragraph (1)(A)(ix) for the subsequent fiscal year shall be equal to 120 percent of the numerical limitation of the given fiscal year; or
+ ``(B) is not reached during a given fiscal year, the numerical limitation under paragraph (1)(A)(ix) for the subsequent fiscal year shall be equal to the numerical limitation of the given fiscal year.''.
so it might help with Dems.
(c) TEMPORARY WORKERS.--Section 214(g) (8 U.S.C. 1184(g)) is amended--
+ 115,000 in the first fiscal year beginning after the date of the enactment of this clause; and
+ [Cap Exempt: Advanced degree in science, technology, engineering, or math.'';]
+ If the numerical limitation in paragraph (1)(A)--
+ ``(A) is reached during a given fiscal year, the numerical limitation under paragraph (1)(A)(ix) for the subsequent fiscal year shall be equal to 120 percent of the numerical limitation of the given fiscal year; or
+ ``(B) is not reached during a given fiscal year, the numerical limitation under paragraph (1)(A)(ix) for the subsequent fiscal year shall be equal to the numerical limitation of the given fiscal year.''.
so it might help with Dems.
tattoo MTE R32 4 550x412 VW Golf R32
Devils_Advocate
04-02 11:03 AM
Where did you get this info from?
He's pulling a fast one, 23,567 is like hitting 1234567, lol
No numbers will be released till 7th of April after which USCIS will again start accepting the petitions again if it hasn't gone into a lottery yet (which it wont)
He's pulling a fast one, 23,567 is like hitting 1234567, lol
No numbers will be released till 7th of April after which USCIS will again start accepting the petitions again if it hasn't gone into a lottery yet (which it wont)
more...
pictures Vw Golf Mk4 1.6 16V Modified
jayleno
07-09 04:11 PM
It depends on where you live. No matter where your original 485 is...
Hi All,
I am applying for EAD renewal and i am confused where to send the documents i mean which service center, my 485, EAD and AP was initially sent to Texas service center in July 2007 and i got EAD and AP approved from Texas then later on they transferred my 485 to Nebraska, now my question is to which service center should in send my renewal request to Texas or Nebraska?.
Thanks in advance.
Hi All,
I am applying for EAD renewal and i am confused where to send the documents i mean which service center, my 485, EAD and AP was initially sent to Texas service center in July 2007 and i got EAD and AP approved from Texas then later on they transferred my 485 to Nebraska, now my question is to which service center should in send my renewal request to Texas or Nebraska?.
Thanks in advance.
dresses Modifying your Volkswagen, and
qplearn
11-21 11:28 PM
Immigration is one of hundred issues for congress. They will see more burning issues. Iraq need to be stablised. That is their first priority. Impact is not for US congress or Corporation if immigration relief is delayed. Only those who are waiting for GC will have more impact than Corporations or Congress. Changing law or passing a bill is not an easy process. Compared to people in 1999 ,2000 now much better. Because on past there were no H1 extension after 6 years. Now those rules changed. Congress may get attention when problem goes out of control like retrogession for Eb2 and Eb3 are 7 or 8 years. Now only indian Eb3 is only very worst situation. Others are much better compared to Indian EB3
Eb2 for India may get delayed by 4-5years. It has hovered around Jan 2003 for last 6-7 months or so; it is a bad situation already. I am hoping we don't have to wait until the wait becomes 7-8 years.
But does anyone know why the timeline seems to sliding? First we heard of newspaper reports suggesting that something will happen in the lame duck, then after the Dem victory we heard that it would happen in Jan, and now it seems March ....
Eb2 for India may get delayed by 4-5years. It has hovered around Jan 2003 for last 6-7 months or so; it is a bad situation already. I am hoping we don't have to wait until the wait becomes 7-8 years.
But does anyone know why the timeline seems to sliding? First we heard of newspaper reports suggesting that something will happen in the lame duck, then after the Dem victory we heard that it would happen in Jan, and now it seems March ....
more...
makeup Vw Golf Mk4 Gti 20v Turbo
insbaby
10-27 12:40 AM
Hi friends,
We know that EB2 is getting stuck in EB3 because of PD porting. I request you EB2's not to procrastinate and send the letter in the next post to the USCIS director. You may mail it with or without your contact info and stop this illegal practice.
Pls do not be lazy to mail this letter. It will save atleast 5 years of tension in your life. If you think others will mail for you are sadly mistaken. There were only 3 letters till today. We need 100 letters atleast to be mailed to the director.
Give me green before I am drowned in red ;)
Think something new. May be you can think about the following to request USCIS
1. Send everyone home except YOU
2. Send everyone home except EB2
3. Life imprisonments to all EB3
Sit and think after midnight, you will get some bright ideas.
We need people like you every few weeks to ease out the pressure. "Lighten up" thread is not enough. Keep going.
Poor USCIS or at least the officer who reads your letter.
We know that EB2 is getting stuck in EB3 because of PD porting. I request you EB2's not to procrastinate and send the letter in the next post to the USCIS director. You may mail it with or without your contact info and stop this illegal practice.
Pls do not be lazy to mail this letter. It will save atleast 5 years of tension in your life. If you think others will mail for you are sadly mistaken. There were only 3 letters till today. We need 100 letters atleast to be mailed to the director.
Give me green before I am drowned in red ;)
Think something new. May be you can think about the following to request USCIS
1. Send everyone home except YOU
2. Send everyone home except EB2
3. Life imprisonments to all EB3
Sit and think after midnight, you will get some bright ideas.
We need people like you every few weeks to ease out the pressure. "Lighten up" thread is not enough. Keep going.
Poor USCIS or at least the officer who reads your letter.
girlfriend I can#39;t wait for my next VW
theseeker
07-13 03:10 AM
Hello !!
To explain my position: I am currently on OPT, and have a H1 approved. My company is in the process of filing Labor Certification for me, and if it goes through I should have a Priority date sometime in August/September. However, I am planning to join a full time MBA program in the coming 2-3 years, which means that I will have to go back to F1 status (in case my GC does not come through before that). In that case, will I be able to retain this Priority date for any future GC filings ?
Thanks in anticipation ..
To explain my position: I am currently on OPT, and have a H1 approved. My company is in the process of filing Labor Certification for me, and if it goes through I should have a Priority date sometime in August/September. However, I am planning to join a full time MBA program in the coming 2-3 years, which means that I will have to go back to F1 status (in case my GC does not come through before that). In that case, will I be able to retain this Priority date for any future GC filings ?
Thanks in anticipation ..
hairstyles hot Black VW Golf Mk4 1.6 Low
imig
05-29 03:09 PM
What happens if you moved and filed AR11 after a year. Does that raise a red flag ?
Does anyone know or have similar experience? Thanks!
Does anyone know or have similar experience? Thanks!
arrarrgee
07-18 12:55 PM
yup..perfect
Man,
I was also at BEC but luckily got out in March 2007 - Thank God again ! my 2nd GC-PD was Mar 05 (EB3) - not sure how they processed quickly in 2 yrs.
Lets come to point now. BEC will be clean by Sep 30th ( that means no one will be stuck - either approved or Rejected) and PD's wont be U starting OCT 1st. I would assume BEC stuck guys have mostly PD before 2003 and once the VB changes from U - they will get their chance to get EAD , AP within 1 year. Already VB was Jun 2003 for Eb3 in June 07 Bulletin. i'm expecting that status will wither maintain or rollback a little .
Of course BEC stuck guys are unlucky but the bad luck won't prevail for ever or 5 years - That's what my Point is.
What do you guys say ???
Man,
I was also at BEC but luckily got out in March 2007 - Thank God again ! my 2nd GC-PD was Mar 05 (EB3) - not sure how they processed quickly in 2 yrs.
Lets come to point now. BEC will be clean by Sep 30th ( that means no one will be stuck - either approved or Rejected) and PD's wont be U starting OCT 1st. I would assume BEC stuck guys have mostly PD before 2003 and once the VB changes from U - they will get their chance to get EAD , AP within 1 year. Already VB was Jun 2003 for Eb3 in June 07 Bulletin. i'm expecting that status will wither maintain or rollback a little .
Of course BEC stuck guys are unlucky but the bad luck won't prevail for ever or 5 years - That's what my Point is.
What do you guys say ???
laborchic
07-01 03:28 PM
Folks,
If you have not yet joined the Tristate Chapter please do so now... Tell your colleagues, relatives, friends to do join the chapter. As mentioned by Chandu we can form small groups and meet the legislative staff over here locally and then into DC.
Hope to talk to more folks on tonights conf call.
If you have not yet joined the Tristate Chapter please do so now... Tell your colleagues, relatives, friends to do join the chapter. As mentioned by Chandu we can form small groups and meet the legislative staff over here locally and then into DC.
Hope to talk to more folks on tonights conf call.
No comments:
Post a Comment