jamesbond007
06-27 10:14 PM
Not sure if INS is now going behing EAD/ 485 applicants after chasing H1Bs or if my employer has done something wrong.
Here is what I got.
I got a letter from INS saying that my Employer has withdrawn my I 140 application. and I need to find a new employer with same job discription with in 30 days.
I had done concurrent filing of 140 and 485 and my I 140 was approved in August 2007.
and I am still working on H1B with out changing my employer. Me and my wife both are using AP but not EAD. Couple of months back my wife converted from H1 to H4 after her company let her go.
I called my employer to know the reason as I still work with him on H1B. My employer claims that he never revoked my I 140 application and its a mistake from INS side. He also claims that another employee of his has got the similar letter and hence the attorey has submited a MTR for the previous case.
My questions:
1. If my attroney submits a 'Motion to Reopen' as my employer stating that he never revoked my i 140, will this be sufficient? or its better to submit a job offer letter of new company using AC 21.
2. If I submit a new job letter saying that I found a new job with the same job discription ( AC21), will it automatically revoke my h1?
3. Can I claim that I have found a new employer, and still work on H1B with old employer? Is that a way to new employer with out loosing my H1B.?
Fourm mates: what is the best thing to do?
Did your wife start GC process with her employer also? If yes, maybe her employer cancelled her I140 and that resulted in a notice to you?
Also, ask your wife to check with her former employer if they requested her H1 to be revoked. I read on these forums of cases where a H1 cancel request resulted in intent to deny notices. That could provide answer to your question why they sent you that notice.
Here is what I got.
I got a letter from INS saying that my Employer has withdrawn my I 140 application. and I need to find a new employer with same job discription with in 30 days.
I had done concurrent filing of 140 and 485 and my I 140 was approved in August 2007.
and I am still working on H1B with out changing my employer. Me and my wife both are using AP but not EAD. Couple of months back my wife converted from H1 to H4 after her company let her go.
I called my employer to know the reason as I still work with him on H1B. My employer claims that he never revoked my I 140 application and its a mistake from INS side. He also claims that another employee of his has got the similar letter and hence the attorey has submited a MTR for the previous case.
My questions:
1. If my attroney submits a 'Motion to Reopen' as my employer stating that he never revoked my i 140, will this be sufficient? or its better to submit a job offer letter of new company using AC 21.
2. If I submit a new job letter saying that I found a new job with the same job discription ( AC21), will it automatically revoke my h1?
3. Can I claim that I have found a new employer, and still work on H1B with old employer? Is that a way to new employer with out loosing my H1B.?
Fourm mates: what is the best thing to do?
Did your wife start GC process with her employer also? If yes, maybe her employer cancelled her I140 and that resulted in a notice to you?
Also, ask your wife to check with her former employer if they requested her H1 to be revoked. I read on these forums of cases where a H1 cancel request resulted in intent to deny notices. That could provide answer to your question why they sent you that notice.
wallpaper Adriana Lima x Vogue#39;s 2011
karl65
04-13 11:09 AM
Now I don't work for anybody.
Well sometimes HR guy does not know anything about immigration law (or they think we don't). Mine tried to make me pay my renewal. I was very polite an send an email telling him that I would be happy to do that but I thought it was not legal and suggest him to ask immigration lawyer. Then he latter sent an email telling me they were going to pay for the fees.....
Well sometimes HR guy does not know anything about immigration law (or they think we don't). Mine tried to make me pay my renewal. I was very polite an send an email telling him that I would be happy to do that but I thought it was not legal and suggest him to ask immigration lawyer. Then he latter sent an email telling me they were going to pay for the fees.....
RadioactveChimp
04-08 02:06 AM
i like this. a lot. I appreciate this so I can shamlessly plug chimps
2011 model Adriana Lima.
dan19
02-13 10:20 AM
At least the sequence of events (VB publishing) is predictable!!!!!
Cut..Paste..Broken Link..Fixed Link...
looks like it is coming today. they have a link that says March 2007, but nothing linked to it.
not that we are expecting anything from it.
http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_1770.html
looks like they have archived it. Not sure what that means, but I think it has been there for some time and there is nothing new here. sorry about the wrong info.
Cut..Paste..Broken Link..Fixed Link...
looks like it is coming today. they have a link that says March 2007, but nothing linked to it.
not that we are expecting anything from it.
http://travel.state.gov/visa/frvi/bulletin/bulletin_1770.html
looks like they have archived it. Not sure what that means, but I think it has been there for some time and there is nothing new here. sorry about the wrong info.
more...
vjkypally
09-05 08:50 AM
8 yrs and Counting.Lets go!!!
plassey
07-21 06:20 PM
People were too quick to give me bad ratings and judge me.
I do not represent any organization and I am not a troll. But I do see something very valuable here that I am eager to preserve. I also see the point that disclosing financial information can be damaging. And no, not in my wildest dream I am questioning the leadership here. They have been amazing.
My argument was if there is a need to build an accountability based system, which will serve to further our cause even if the current leadership is no longer active. As a matter of fact they are the ones (current leadership) who are in best position to create this type of system.
I am still of the opinion that financial information should be disclosed but in light of the argument put forth earlier, I would modify my argument to include only high paying members (and not just paying members). These are basics of a governance model , which are also the foundation of a great organization.
I do not represent any organization and I am not a troll. But I do see something very valuable here that I am eager to preserve. I also see the point that disclosing financial information can be damaging. And no, not in my wildest dream I am questioning the leadership here. They have been amazing.
My argument was if there is a need to build an accountability based system, which will serve to further our cause even if the current leadership is no longer active. As a matter of fact they are the ones (current leadership) who are in best position to create this type of system.
I am still of the opinion that financial information should be disclosed but in light of the argument put forth earlier, I would modify my argument to include only high paying members (and not just paying members). These are basics of a governance model , which are also the foundation of a great organization.
more...
JunRN
05-16 02:46 PM
IOs are like robots. They use a Manual that looks like a procedure in structural programming with different sub-procedures. All they do is follow them step by step.
The July fiasco and AC21 was not interjected into the procedures so the reason why we see some of these errors.
The July fiasco and AC21 was not interjected into the procedures so the reason why we see some of these errors.
2010 Adriana Lima x Victoria#39;s
coopheal
04-24 08:24 AM
Bump
more...
Wish_Good
04-26 06:20 PM
Hi All,
My Current Situation: I-140 approved -Jan 22, 2009 with company B, 7th year of my H1 ending July 2009, Current company B applied H1 extension, But denied based on Old "Company A" I-485 - which is denied (June 26th 2008).
Looks like USCIS didn�t considered my current company�s approved 1-140.
Right now, I applied MTR (appeal) provided all documents.. like approved I-140 copy, LC copy and previous H1 copies.. etc.
*Usually how much time they will take to respond this kind of Issues.
And also at the same time... can I file another H1 from New Company.. for example. ( my client) while this MTR is in processed.
Please give me your valuable advice.
Thank You All,
WG.
My Current Situation: I-140 approved -Jan 22, 2009 with company B, 7th year of my H1 ending July 2009, Current company B applied H1 extension, But denied based on Old "Company A" I-485 - which is denied (June 26th 2008).
Looks like USCIS didn�t considered my current company�s approved 1-140.
Right now, I applied MTR (appeal) provided all documents.. like approved I-140 copy, LC copy and previous H1 copies.. etc.
*Usually how much time they will take to respond this kind of Issues.
And also at the same time... can I file another H1 from New Company.. for example. ( my client) while this MTR is in processed.
Please give me your valuable advice.
Thank You All,
WG.
hair super model Adriana Lima
indianabacklog
10-25 01:22 PM
It is surprise to see people from ROW with PD 2002 and still no GC that's very sorry state of affair.
Please keep voting so that others can understand more about ROW situation.
The priority date for ROW EB2 was at August 2002 for months through until May of this year. So those still pending must be from the end of 2002 like myself whose date is November 2002.
Please keep voting so that others can understand more about ROW situation.
The priority date for ROW EB2 was at August 2002 for months through until May of this year. So those still pending must be from the end of 2002 like myself whose date is November 2002.
more...
gcisadawg
06-05 11:38 PM
posting complete details:
Hi,
Earlier also I posted request.
My Current Situation: I-140 approved -Jan 22, 2009 with company B, 7th year of my H1 ending July 2009, Current company B applied H1 extension, But denied based on Old "Company A" I-485 - which is denied (June 26th 2008).
Right now, I applied MTR (appeal) provided all documents.. like approved I-140 copy, LC copy and previous H1 copies.. etc.
While waiting for this Pending MTR decision. Can I continue my work, and Is there any limit on number of days. Because my H1 is expiring July 13th 2009.
Please give your valuable suggestion.
Thanks in Advance.
Wish Good.
Did you explore the option of filing for a new extension based on Company B's ( current company) approved I-140 instead of filing an MTR.
Hi,
Earlier also I posted request.
My Current Situation: I-140 approved -Jan 22, 2009 with company B, 7th year of my H1 ending July 2009, Current company B applied H1 extension, But denied based on Old "Company A" I-485 - which is denied (June 26th 2008).
Right now, I applied MTR (appeal) provided all documents.. like approved I-140 copy, LC copy and previous H1 copies.. etc.
While waiting for this Pending MTR decision. Can I continue my work, and Is there any limit on number of days. Because my H1 is expiring July 13th 2009.
Please give your valuable suggestion.
Thanks in Advance.
Wish Good.
Did you explore the option of filing for a new extension based on Company B's ( current company) approved I-140 instead of filing an MTR.
hot 2010 adriana lima 2011.
jindhal
01-21 02:51 PM
why is roth ira good if there is no tax benefit for it, what i mean is , isnt traditional IRA good because your AGI reduces and it helps in tax filing....
But if i invest in roth IRA my taxable income does not reduce....
I can as well invest my after tax money in a money market account right, why is roth IRA so good ?
1) Should we not invest in traditional IRA?
2) Like roth ira does traditional IRA have any benefit for first time home buysers ?
1) Your taxable income doesnt reduce with a ROTH IRA but you dont pay any tax on the income you make from your ROTH Account. You can invest the money from your roth into stocks, bond or just plain money market. When you sell your stocks and make a neat profit.. its all tax free !
2) If you buy a home for the first time you can withdraw 10000 from your roth account. Now on a ROTH you can withdraw your contribution at any time so the 10,000 is all earnings that you have on the account. (if you contribute 4K per year from 2005 to 2010 you can withdraw 20K without any tax penalties and any profit that you might have made from that 20K you can withdraw upto a limit of 10K) there are additional conditions other than just buying a home listed in the IRS Publication. I dont remember the exact number but its something like publication 590.
But if i invest in roth IRA my taxable income does not reduce....
I can as well invest my after tax money in a money market account right, why is roth IRA so good ?
1) Should we not invest in traditional IRA?
2) Like roth ira does traditional IRA have any benefit for first time home buysers ?
1) Your taxable income doesnt reduce with a ROTH IRA but you dont pay any tax on the income you make from your ROTH Account. You can invest the money from your roth into stocks, bond or just plain money market. When you sell your stocks and make a neat profit.. its all tax free !
2) If you buy a home for the first time you can withdraw 10000 from your roth account. Now on a ROTH you can withdraw your contribution at any time so the 10,000 is all earnings that you have on the account. (if you contribute 4K per year from 2005 to 2010 you can withdraw 20K without any tax penalties and any profit that you might have made from that 20K you can withdraw upto a limit of 10K) there are additional conditions other than just buying a home listed in the IRS Publication. I dont remember the exact number but its something like publication 590.
more...
house adriana lima 2011 pics.
dannyvn
08-04 08:30 PM
Thanks for your reply. I am with the same employer no change. I just called USCIS today and request to expedite the applications. Hopefully they get approved soon.
Thanks
Thanks
tattoo Adriana Lima
eastindia
04-09 10:07 AM
DOS has re-posted the demand data after the error corrections.
http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/Empl...utOffDates.pdf (http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/EmploymentDemandUsedForCutOffDates.pdf)
Did they read IV forums or did someone from core contacted them?
It is good they are listening.
http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/Empl...utOffDates.pdf (http://www.travel.state.gov/pdf/EmploymentDemandUsedForCutOffDates.pdf)
Did they read IV forums or did someone from core contacted them?
It is good they are listening.
more...
pictures adriana lima 2011 sexy
kdprasad
07-09 07:23 PM
I am in Minneapolis and in the same boat.!!! Let me know if you need help on this story.
dresses adriana lima 2011 fashion
belmontboy
05-02 08:18 PM
I think they will let you work part time in EAD and still maintain your H1 status, hopefully.
what makes u think like this? :D
what makes u think like this? :D
more...
makeup Adriana Lima 2011 desktop
nvrgc
11-09 03:05 PM
Hi Styrum, I am in the same boat as you are. Reason for rejection: H12 'NO" understood as "YES" by Melanie Shay. My ads expired. What did you end up doing? Please advise
girlfriend adriana lima 2011 pictures.
Lasantha
07-18 02:38 PM
There may have been discrimanation prior to the 65 law. But now all the countries have the same quota. So where's the discrimination?
hairstyles 4 Adriana Lima 2011 wallpaper
MCQ
06-16 11:57 AM
This latest proposal from Arizona is unlikely to ever succeed.
It is clearly Un-Constitutional, as the Constitution is currently written, as it falls foul of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment. some background below ........
"Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. "
For Arizona to succeed in this ill-advised adventure and deny citizenship to the children of illegal aliens and have it retroactive, two changes to the Constitution would need to be made.
1. Section 1 would need to be modified to say that your parents would need to be here legally if you were to qualify for Citizenship
2. If they real did want to make this retroactive (good luck trying that - again would never fly) they would need to change the Constitution again - so as to allow the change to be retro-active - which the Constitution for the most part forbids (Article One, Section 9).
In any case - the road to a constitutional change is hard, hard enough that it has only been successfuly done twenty seven times since it was adopted in 1787 and ratified and came into force in 1789.
The process for doing so is laid out in Article 5 of the Constitution - but the upshot is as follows:
Arizona - should they choose to go down this path has to do one of two things.
EITHER - persuade both Houses of Congress to approve it - by two thirds majorities of the quorate membership of both houses AND then get the changes approved by three quarters (75% - or at this point 38 (needs to be a whole number)) of the State Legislatures to approve it - and they work to their own rules of passing a Federal Constitutional Amendment.
OR
They could ask two thirds of the States' Legislatures (need 34) to petition Congress for a Constitutional Convention to look for specific changes to the Constitution.
Although the Convention Option might seem more attractive - not one of the current 27 Amendments was proposed or adopted by this method.
I hope they don't try this - it will fail, cost a lot of money and cause anguish on both sides of the debate and probably lead to further polarisation.
On the other hand - if they do try it - then finally the Federal Government might wake up and actually do something in the sphere of CIR.
I won't be holding my breath.
Slainte!
McQ
It is clearly Un-Constitutional, as the Constitution is currently written, as it falls foul of Section 1 of the 14th Amendment. some background below ........
"Section 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws. "
For Arizona to succeed in this ill-advised adventure and deny citizenship to the children of illegal aliens and have it retroactive, two changes to the Constitution would need to be made.
1. Section 1 would need to be modified to say that your parents would need to be here legally if you were to qualify for Citizenship
2. If they real did want to make this retroactive (good luck trying that - again would never fly) they would need to change the Constitution again - so as to allow the change to be retro-active - which the Constitution for the most part forbids (Article One, Section 9).
In any case - the road to a constitutional change is hard, hard enough that it has only been successfuly done twenty seven times since it was adopted in 1787 and ratified and came into force in 1789.
The process for doing so is laid out in Article 5 of the Constitution - but the upshot is as follows:
Arizona - should they choose to go down this path has to do one of two things.
EITHER - persuade both Houses of Congress to approve it - by two thirds majorities of the quorate membership of both houses AND then get the changes approved by three quarters (75% - or at this point 38 (needs to be a whole number)) of the State Legislatures to approve it - and they work to their own rules of passing a Federal Constitutional Amendment.
OR
They could ask two thirds of the States' Legislatures (need 34) to petition Congress for a Constitutional Convention to look for specific changes to the Constitution.
Although the Convention Option might seem more attractive - not one of the current 27 Amendments was proposed or adopted by this method.
I hope they don't try this - it will fail, cost a lot of money and cause anguish on both sides of the debate and probably lead to further polarisation.
On the other hand - if they do try it - then finally the Federal Government might wake up and actually do something in the sphere of CIR.
I won't be holding my breath.
Slainte!
McQ
praveenuppaluri
03-10 04:03 PM
Uma, when you filled out the new form DS 160, what did you answer for the question about name in native language? did you simply check "do not apply" and moved on or did you try fancy stuff like typing your name in native font and pasting it in the form?
thanks for sharing your experience.
thanks for sharing your experience.
visli_com
07-01 05:31 PM
Pl. reply.
For all those who have changed employers and ported their date successfully, did you use AC21 to change employer? If so, since its required that the job be same/similar, how were you able to port PD to a EB2 application?
For all those who have changed employers and ported their date successfully, did you use AC21 to change employer? If so, since its required that the job be same/similar, how were you able to port PD to a EB2 application?
No comments:
Post a Comment